CHM 212- CHEMICAL PRINCIPLES II


CHM212 Main Menu


ISSUE #1
SHOULD THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD COMMIT TO SPECIFIC GOALS FOR THE REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES?

C. Ophardt, Professor of Chemistry, Elmhurst College; Elmhurst, IL. Copyright 2000

Issue 1 Introduction
Debate Question
Internet Resource Sites

Issue 1 On-line Discussion

GLOBAL CLIMATE WARMING DEBATE

The final part of this exercise is the "Global Warming Debate ", where you will use the information and concepts from all the sources to engage other students in a general debate. The instructor will divide the class into groups for the debate. The groups should eventually reach a consensus on one of the the options listed below.
The "United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change" was adopted by a large number of nations at the 1992 "Earth Summit" in Rio de Janeiro.

General reference:

http://www.unep.ch/iuc/

Click on Climate Change or go directly to
Beginners Guide to The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

For more information to be used in the debate check out some of the Internet Resources lower on this page.

At this time firm targets and timetables were established in 1997, in a new effort in Koyto, Japan. A summary of the Koyto Agreement.

2. ...endorse the Second Assessment Report of the IPCC as currently the most comprehensive and authoritative assessment of the science of climate change, its impacts and response options now available. ....should provide a scientific basis for urgently strengthening action at the global, regional and national levels, ... to limit and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, and for all Parties to support the development of a Protocol; and note the findings of the IPCC, in particular the following:
- The balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate. Without specific policies to mitigate climate change, the global average surface temperature relative to 1990 is projected to increase by about 2 C (between 1 C and 3.5 C) by 2100; average sea level is projected to rise by about 50 centimeters (between 15 and 95 centimeters) above present levels by 2100. Stabilization of atmospheric concentrations at twice preindustrial levels will eventually require global emissions to be less than 50 per cent of current levels;
- The projected changes in climate will result in significant, often adverse, impacts on many ecological systems and socioeconomic sectors, including food supply and water resources, and on human health. In some cases, the impacts are potentially irreversible; developing countries and small island countries are typically more vulnerable to climate change;
- Significant reductions in net greenhouse gas emissions are technically possible and economically feasible by utilizing an array of technology policy measures that accelerate technology development, diffusion and transfer; and significant no regrets opportunities are available in most countries to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions;

8. Instruct their representatives to accelerate negotiations on the text of a legally-binding protocol or another legal instrument to be completed in due time ...regarding:

* policies and measures including, as appropriate, regarding energy, transport, industry, agriculture, forestry, waste management, economic instruments, institutions and mechanisms;

*quantified legally-binding objectives for emission limitations and significant overall reductions within specified timeframes, such as 2005, 2010, 2020, with respect to their anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of greenhouse gases not controlled by the Montreal Protocol;"

DEBATE QUESTION: Should the U.S. Senate ratify the Koyto Treaty and agree to quantified legally-binding objectives for greenhouse gas emission limitations and significant overall reductions within specified timeframes?


 Group 1. Students (A-L)

 Group 2. Students (M-Z)

 Assigments are by letters of last names.

 Option # 1 Yes: Students A-D  Option # 1 Yes: Students M-R
 Option # 2 No: Students E-L  Option # 2 No: Students S-Z


Option # 1:
Yes. Establish an international agreement on a long term goal for stabilizing greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere at a level that minimizes the risks to the biosphere and to human societies, with a specific commitment to stabilize carbon dioxide emissions at 1990 levels by the year 2010.

If you endorse this position, make some recommendations about how to reduce the use of fossil fuels.

Option # 2: No. No action is needed because the "theory" of global warming caused by the burning of fossil fuels, is an unsupported assumption. Continued research is necessary, before any costly counter measures are implemented.

Various theoretical climate models used to predict future warming can not be relied upon and are not validated by existing climate record.



INTERNET RESOURCES:

The first references are either general information and/or on the YES side of the debate.

Climate Change Information Kit- the Climate Change Convention - contains quite a few links.

Greenhouse Effect Australia
This is a very brief article and includes a few graphics and glossary of terms.

Global Climate Change Information Programme - comprehensive series of short essays and fact sheets.

Global Warming: Myth vs. Facts, Environmental Defense Fund Pro side

GLOBAL WARMING HOT AIR: SOME POPULAR MYTHS DISPELLED -pro

Myths of Global Warming National Center for Policy Analysis -Brief Analysis more on the pro side

Global Warming Alert: A Primer on the Issue

Climate Models: How Reliable are their Predictions? A comprehensive look at how models are constructed, used, and an evaluation of the predictions made from these models.

Examination of Climate Model Predictions vs. Actual Facts - Reputable source - more of a NO slant. Contains a Greenhouse Scored Card about half way down the article.

Koyto Compromise - the latest agreements reached in December of 1997. Look also at some of the Newspaper articles on the bottom of the page as they give some pros and cons.

Sites that have more of a NO side slant:

Global Climate - contains some skeptics links - more toward the bottom of the pages.

Global Warming Skeptic's page

Still Waiting for Greenhouse A Lukewarm View of Global Warming by - John L. Daly

World Climate Report gives contrary views on global warming. Look at the Current Features section to get a long list of articles from past issues. Might be slow in loading.

Greenhouse Warming: Fact, Hypothesis, or Myth? Careful examination of data from a scientific skeptic.

The Koyto Protocol--Bad for the Environment?

Global Warming Information Page



WWW Search Tools or Directories
AltaVista ||| Magellan - search directory ||| Yahoo Gateway directory


Issue 1 - Discussion

DEBATE QUESTION: Should the U.S. Senate ratify the Koyto Treaty and agree to quantified legally-binding objectives for greenhouse gas emission limitations and significant overall reductions within specified timeframes?

Various members of the class and the professor contributed to the discussion. Please read these postings before you make a contribution to this ongoing discussion. You may add new information for this discussion, make further comments on information already posted, or ask questions to other students or the professor about the information already posted. Answers to THREE Rounds of Discussion are required. This may be done all at once or you may wait for more of the discussion in Round 1 to be completed before giving your final answer to the question in Round 2.


Five questions from sub questions in 1-6 - find one that no one has answered, before doubling up.
Main debate question (Ques. 7)
One follow up response to another student.

Various members of the class and the professor contributed to the discussion. Please read these postings before you make a contribution to this ongoing discussion. You may add new information for this discussion, make further comments on information already posted, or ask questions to other students or the professor about the information already posted. Answers to THREE Rounds of Discussion are required. This may be done all at once or you may wait for more of the discussion in Round 1 to be completed before giving your final answer to the question in Round 2. A third round of discussion to respond to some other student is required after a number of students have posted.

Round 1 Discussion: (5 points)
Discussion Starters: Since an Issue is relatively complex, I have used the "General Questions" as a guideline to get the discussion started. For the 1st Round of Discussion we will consider questions 1-6. I have posed some simpler sub questions under these which you might answer to get things started. Each student should answer a total of 5 subquestions- one from each of the 6 main questions (one main question may be omitted). As more students join the discussion, they should answer questions that have not already been answered or may answer again and give additional information. You may pose other questions or make other comments that are relevant to the issue in Ques 6.
For this issue, everyone MUST answer either 2a or 2b as one of the five questions above.
 
Round 2 Discussion: (See QUES. 7 below) (4 points)
Give your final answer to the main issue question. Clearly state which option YES or NO that you support, then give brief reasons and explanations for your answer (3-5 paragraphs should be sufficient)
 
Round 3 Discussion: (1 point): After some students have posted responses in all of the questions 1-7, then for your final response, make a comment, rebuttal, or answer a question posed by the other students. The purpose for this is to try to get a little more "give and take" discussion of the issue as would happen in a "live" oral discussion. You may make a short response to points made in the final debate question (QUES. 7) or any of the sub questions 1-6.
 
 ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS: The best method to answer questions is to type the answers in a word processor so that you have a copy as a backup. Then when you are ready to post the answer to the bulletin board - select and copy the text from the word processor, go to Netscape, find the question series below this box, click on the Issue Discussion Forum Question link, scroll down the Message box, click cursor in the box, paste the text into the box, and finally post the message.

 Group 1. Students (A-L)

 Group 2. Students (M-Z)

 Assigments are by letters of last names.

 Option # 1 Yes: Students A-D  Option # 1 Yes: Students M-R
 Option # 2 No: Students E-L  Option # 2 No: Students S-Z

General Questions - Issue #1

Please read the discussion responses before you decide which questions to answer. Try to answer questions that no one else has answered or respond to answers already present.

Check out the discussion responses on the
CHM 212 Discussion Forum for Issue # 1.

Use the following questions to briefly summarize the critical thinking necessary to solve the problem.

1. Identify the major technologies used and science concepts and principles which are applied to the technologies in this issue. Definitions: Technology is the application of scientific knowledge in the creation of new products and processes. Science is the knowledge gathered about the natural world through observations and controlled experimentation.

Issue Discussion Forum - Ques. 1 Technology Definition

QUES. 1a. What technologies are currently used to provide energy in a modern society?

QUES. 1b.What types of fuels are used for these energy sources?

QUES. 1c.What is the combustion reaction?

QUES. 1d.What is the important by-product of this reaction that is important for this issue?

QUES. 1e. What are some alternate energy sources that could be developed further?

2. Identify the issues, questions, limitations or drawbacks involved with the technology, especially environmental effects. Definition: Application of technology is called into question when the quality of life and/or the environment deteriorates.

For this issue only, everyone MUST answer either 2a or 2b in addition to the one question listed above. This will be counted as 2 pts. extra credit.

Based upon the data presented in Evidence for Global Warming,

QUES. 2a: What is the evidence that temperature and carbon dioxide concentrations are correlated?

QUES. 2b. What is the evidence that the use of fossil fuels, which produce carbon dioxide, is causing climate change?

Issue Discussion Forum - Ques. 2 Issues, Questions

 

3. For the issues and questions above, list/explain the science concepts and cause and effect relationships involved; and/or identify the use of the scientific method (Hypothesis? Experiments? Results and Conclusions?) to prove or disprove any of the questions or hypotheses.

Issue Discussion Forum - Ques. 3: Science Concepts

QUES. 3a.Explain the operation of a greenhouse or the inside of your car on a sunny day?

Dr. O responds: Incoming radiation from the sun in the form of ultraviolet and visible light pass through the glass of a green house or the windshield of your car. Then as the light bounces around inside of the greenhouse the energy is changed to infrared energy which is unable to pass through the glass. The infrared energy then heats the air on the inside of the greenhouse.

QUES. 3b. How does the atmosphere and the presence of carbon dioxide behave like the greenhouse analogy?

QUES. 3c.From your reading did you find at least 3-4 other gases that are also considered greenhouse gases? Explain further.

QUES. 3d. How are computer models used to predict that carbon dioxide and temperature increases are related?

QUES. 3e. What are the consequences to the environment and human society should global warming occur?

Issue Discussion Forum - Ques. 3: Science Concepts

 

4. Identify the limitations or uncertainties of the science in understanding and/or solving the problem. Definition: Science is more limited in its ability to deal with systems with complex interactions because it can effectively study only a small number of variables and is incapable of controlling all of the variables. The "answers" provided by science may not be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Issue Discussion Forum - Ques. 4: Uncertainties in Science

QUES. 4a. How good is the temperature data that is being used to support the theory of global warming?

QUES. 4b. Can this data be used as an absolute proven fact that global warming is already occurring or will occur?

QUES. 4c. How accurate are the computer models in making predictions? What is the limitation on their accuracy?

Issue Discussion Forum - Ques. 4: Uncertainties in Science

 

5. Identify the social, philosophical, and/or ethical issues. Definition: Social issues relate to the general welfare of society. Philosophical issues relate to the principles and values for the conduct of life. Ethical issues are concerned with morals (distinction between right and wrong) and values (the ultimate worth of actions or "things").

Issue Discussion Forum - Ques. 5: Social and Ethical Issues

QUES. 5a. Are fossil fuels being used excessively in the industrialized countries to provide for the convenience of society?

QUES. 5b. What are the economic ramifications of a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions mandate?

QUES. 5c. As currently proposed in the agreement in Koyto, Japan, December 1997, the industrialized nations committed to reducing carbon dioxide emissions, while the undeveloped nations such as China, India, and others did not commit to any reductions. Is this correct and fair?

QUES. 5d. Should people be charged a tax to more accurately reflect the damage done to the environment by the use of excessive energy?

QUES. 5e. Is society morally responsible to provide a livable world for future generations?

Issue Discussion Forum - Ques. 5: Social and Ethical Issues

 

QUES. 6: Use this space to make general comments or ask other questions.

Issue Discussion Forum - Ques. 6: General Comments, Questions

2nd Round of Discussion:

QUES. 7: Based upon all of the evidence presented, as an individual citizen or as a group, what course of action would you take regarding the main issue question? This is worth 4 points and requires a 4-6 paragraph answer for full credit.


 Group 1. Students (A-L)

 Group 2. Students (M-Z)

 Assigments are by letters of last names.

 Option # 1 Yes: Students A-D  Option # 1 Yes: Students M-P
 Option # 2 No: Students E-L  Option # 2 No: Students Q-Z

ISSUE QUESTION: Should the U.S. Senate ratify the Koyto Treaty and agree to quantified legally-binding objectives for greenhouse gas emission limitations and significant overall reductions within specified timeframes?

Option # 1: Yes. Establish an international agreement on a long term goal for stabilizing greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere at a level that minimizes the risks to the biosphere and to human societies, with a specific commitment to stabilize carbon dioxide emissions at 1990 levels by the year 2010.

If you endorse this position, make some recommendations about how to reduce the use of fossil fuels.

Group 1 - Ques. 7: Answer Issue Question (Groups 1 - Students A-L)
Group 2 - Ques. 7: Answer Issue Question (Groups 2 - Students M-Z)

Option # 2: No. No action is needed because the "theory" of global warming caused by the burning of fossil fuels, is an unsupported assumption. Continued research is necessary, before any costly counter measures are implemented.

Interpret available information and data to formulate a solution to the question and a possible plan of action.

Group 1 - Ques. 7: Answer Issue Question (Groups 1 - Students A-L)
Group 2 - Ques. 7: Answer Issue Question (Groups 2 - Students M-Z)