|
Questions |
Internet Resources |
|
Ques. 1a. Student # 1: Briefly summarize the
history of chemical contamination at Woburn and list several
of the chemicals found.
Student # 2:Research two of the chemicals to give name, use,
and toxicity. Use links in box above to find info about the chemicals.
|
First
Newspaper Story on Hazardous Material
Industrial
History |
|
Ques. 1b. Each student should research at two more
of the chemicals to give name, use, and toxicity. Be sure to
look at the following as these were named specifically in the
trial:
trichloroethylene
(TCE), tetrachloroethylene
(PERC) and 1,2-trans-dichloroethylene
(DCE)
1,1,1-trichloroethane, or TCA; and chloroform.)
Use links in box above to find info about the chemicals.
You may want to look at hexavalent chromium as this was found
in this case and is the subject of a recent movie "Erin
Brockovich".
|
65
Chemicals Found in Subsurface Water this information was
not used effectively in the trial |
| Ques. 2a: Briefly, what
is the nature of the evidence for an increase in cancer rates
in Woburn. Summarize some of the key points. |
Deaths
From Cancer Increase in Woburn
Childhood
Leukemia Answers Sought
TCE
and renal cancer
Health
Studies related to water at Woburn-summarizes the evidence
at the time of the trial.
|
| Ques. 2b: What are the main
conclusions of the leukemia childhood follow up study? What chemicals
may be the cause? Consult the answers to Ques. 1b to find out
if the toxicity data for these chemicals has been reported -
if not post one or more of them. |
Woburn
Childhood Leukemia Follow-up Study - this study was not completed
until 1997 - too late for the trial.
Birth
Defects Study
|
| Ques. 3: Several students
should work on summarizing various aspects of the trial. After
the first summary, following students should fill in more details
to the summary rather than just starting from scratch each time.
Points to look for - What did they have to prove about the water
from the wells? What proof was needed? What errors were made?
What did the experts say? What evidence contradicted the facts
that the chemicals came from W.R. Grace? |
Dan Kennedy - Death
and Justice - Trial summary -
Toxic
Trial - Jonathan Harr talks to Dan Kennedy - short summary
Judges
Ruling on the Trial -
|
|
Ques. 4: Summarize the trial and evidence from
the point of view of W. R. Grace. What are the differences in
the interpretation of the evidence? What evidence points away
fromo WR Grace as being the cause of contamination in the wells?
Who really should have been sued along with the companies?
|
First
report on Barrels of waste found (not at the Grace site)
Possible
Arsenic and Chromium contaimination (not connected to Grace)
Suumerizes
History of Water in Woburn - Look carefully at the Wells
G and H and the role played by the Water department of the city
of Woburn.
Dan Kennedy - Death
and Justice - Trial summary - Read the section "The
Trouble with George" - the results of his testimony deflected
testimony away from WR Grace.
Contaimination
may have come from the river - mostly rebutted here,
|
|
Ques. 5: What is the significance of the U. S. Geologic
Survey study about the Aberjona River as a source of contamination
of the well water? Also look for the relevant evidence and contention
in the Take
Two by Dan Kennedy.
"Schlichtmann's shortcomings were never more obvious
than in the testimony of his poorly prepared lead witness, George
Pinder, a nationally recognized hydrogeologist whose role was
to explain how contaminated ground water beneath the Beatrice
and Grace properties flowed into the drinking-water wells.
Pinder put forth a bizarre theory that the wells couldn't have
drawn water from the heavily polluted Aberjona River, on whose
banks they had been drilled, yet could readily pull water from
the Beatrice property, on the other side of the river and some
distance away. Facher easily -- and brutally -- exposed Pinder's
testimony as erroneous. Harr, in A Civil Action, describes
Pinder's mistake as an honest one, and I believe him. But at
the time, Pinder came off as someone who had been caught concocting
a tale to benefit his client. ***(Government tests later revealed
that the wells pulled about 40 percent of their water from the
river, but that a considerable quantity of toxins from beneath
the Grace and Beatrice properties had nevertheless found their
way into the wells.)***"
|
Simulation
of Possible TCE movement -from Ohio State Site
W. R. Grace still fails the test
Contaimination
may have come from the river - mostly rebutted here,
|
| Ques. 6: As a result of the
trial the area became a Superfund site.What has or is being accomplished
by the remediation of the Superfund sites? How are the problems
of being corrected? what chemicals are being removed from the
ground water? |
Wells
G and H - EPA Superfund Site overview, background, fact sheet,
etc |
| Ques. 7: As described in this
article, what are the lessons to be learned from this case study? |
A
Civil Inaction Daniel D. Kennedy |
| Ques. 8: Comment on the accuracy
of the movie to actual events. What can be learned from this
case? |
Epilogue: A
Civil Action the Real Story |
| |
Additional Resources:
Newspaper stories
related to Civil Action
A Toxic
Legacy - news paper articles by Dan Kennedy |